Slaves of Saraswati
I’ll start off with “Saraswati”. She is the Indian Goddess of wisdom and knowledge, more so for the Hindus than anybody else in India. She is the embodiment of all that is related to education and is prayed to at all time during the student life, more so during tests and examinations. She is also one of the most exploited. In the sense that right from childhood till you start earning enough to keep the society happy all things good, bad and ugly are attributed to either a good education and bad education or simple lack of it. We concentrate on education and completely overlook wisdom and knowledge. No one will ever see how the other skills may have helped them lead a good life; instead it will be education that has to be blamed. Now, even the politicians have started to use this, just for fun and a good electoral base. Free education to all, free food if you go to the classes and free lack of future with the same. Right from the poorest to the richest, the one with food and the one without, all are lured into the vicious want of education. A child may not want it, may be even against it and interested in something completely different, say dramatics or painting, but no, the child has to study to reach all that his elders achieved and all that the society expects him to. It’s good to be educated but it should not be an end. Sad.
With education should come understanding and logical reasoning rather than becoming unreasonable and crude. More than anything else, people are all in for degrees; bachelors, masters and may be a doctorate. What is the end of this? There are not enough jobs in the market and we have a surplus supply of unemployed youth and talent that is being wasted. The educated person will not take to a job that he considers menial to his qualification. We have a few hundred thousand engineers that pas out of the engineering colleges that have mushroomed over the years. They are not as well read as the students from the premier institutes and hence miss out on the opportunities. Thankfully, we have the Infosys and TCS to take in much of this talent. We have a civil engineer writing codes or maybe answering the clients in the US. Not bad, but still a talent in civil engineering wasted. This also is the mother to many vices that the Indian society is fast getting into. We have chain snatching, robberies, heists by the educated of the society. One of the reasons, out of the many possible is lack of satisfaction. The youth is not satisfied as he feels that he is not able to get what his seniors or neighbours got. To get him off the guilt of being unsuccessful he takes up vice as a channel to fulfillment. How can something as noble as education get someone to be evil?
The Indian system is kind off a reason for all this that we see and it is not that we cannot get out of it. We can very easily, just that the change is dreaded and the “Chalta hai” (it’s OK) attitude are to be blamed and gotten rid of. Since freedom, we have been more socialist than capitalist. From childhood the vices of capitalism have been shown to all. I agree Indian culture is more about caring and sharing but when these become a burden and lead to loss of precious human resources; it’s time to check it. We have all sorts of departments and ministries that take care of everything. The government instead of governing and leading the nation towards development is more about how to check growth and prevent de centralization of power. The ministries will not lose control of anything as it may lead to loss of income for everybody, right from the minister to the peon who sits in the office. Water, electricity, roads, healthcare, railways; you name it and it is all in the hands of the government. The implementation is missing and all that we have had in the last sixty four years are big promises and even bigger dreams, all of which have been shattered.
Railways have laid just10% railways lines in the last so many years when the British laid the rest in smaller time period.
The government is more for changing names and erecting statues of unknown to meet political ends than development. Amethi by any other name will remain as under developed and as impoverished as ever. Years of promises by the Gandhi’s and now the Dalit icon Mayawati have gone down the drain and will continue to do so if we don’t work for it. We make hue and cry about privatization and the profits that the companies will make and completely oversee the profits the individuals called ministers have been making all these years. They also don’t create jobs the way private enterprises do. All goes to one who uses the money to exploit even more. Let’s take an example of water. Should we privatise it? NO will be the loud answer that all of us will hear. An essential natural resource, how can we even think of selling it at a price? Let’s look more carefully at the situation and compare it with reality that we completely ignore. Can any of us drink water directly from the tap? We can do so in Singapore and the US or any developed nation. So the poor are not getting potable water anyways. The government will tell us how to boil and drink it and make us spend money on every liter to be safe. And the upper middle class and the rich will purchase bottled water. Is this bottled water not privatized water? We are already using privatized water at a much higher price but still the government tag remains to save the organizations, ministries and the huge inefficiencies that come with it. Same for the food grains and the several thousand tones wasted every year not reaching the poor who buy it at a much higher price from the black market. Think of it, it is a big shame for all of us.
Remember some fifteen years back how it was to get a telephone line at home. Years of wait, hundreds spent on the babus in bribe and the inefficient service that we all got used to. Then came mobile telephony and thanks to the incompetence of the babus it had to be made open to private players. Not only did the competition help in lowering the price, get efficiencies of scale and a phone for everyone it got the same department to start working and trying to save their jobs and several thousand jobs for everybody. Now the same babu will not ask for money, will not want more time, they just want you, the customer. Several lakh villages are now connected and all can enjoy the fruits of this revolution. People may not have anything else but they definitely own a phone.
Let’s listen to a story. There are two people A and B on an island, they have to fish and survive. They catch 7 fishes each. Both are happy and content. Suddenly A realizes that he can catch much more fish if he has a net. He sees that it will take him five days to make it and he can survive on 5 fishes rather than the usual 7 he takes. He calculates that he needs 25 fishes to make the net. He saves 2 fishes for 13 days and then when he has 26 fishes he gets down to work. After 5 days he has the net ready, and he starts to catch 50 fishes every day. He is rich. B sees this and starts to complain about how poor he is with just 7 fishes, blames A for his miseries and wants a share from A’s hard work. He finally gets it and does nothing but sleeps. This is what the government is doing. It is breeding people like B and making A not to think and grow. Instead of B starting to concentrate on other avenues he cried, maybe B could have gone in for dramatics and entertained A, and got fishes from him as a fee and A’s efficiency would have improved and he would have caught more fishes making everybody richer. But no, we want one to feed all.
As I had said earlier that people want more and more degrees with no jobs for them. If we privatise then maybe we will create more jobs many would like to go for what they feel is their forte, not needing to study or cram through the exams. In the developed nations a gardener, a barber earns the same as a programmer. With better skills he may earn even more. Not so in India where there is a huge divide of rich and poor on what a person does. A gardener or say a farmer may be toiling the whole month but may not even quarter of what a programmer on bench may be making. Isn’t this an irony of our society. We are not able to realize the true value of hard work and labour, both mental and physical.
We have to get rid of these vices. Government, as the name suggests, is for governing and not for implementing. Give away the implementation to others, have proper guidelines monitor and regulate but not be an impediment to the development and prosperity of all, not for the benefits of the ministers and their families. This may sooner or later lead to such levels of dissatisfaction that the ministers may not remain relevant. We don’t want a Sierra Leone of India. We want the best for Bharat Mata, the mother as we all call her. Let’s open our minds and get the best. May be privatization is what we want. Let’s be devotee of Saraswati and not her slaves and get to know how we can all prosper together.
Many of the thoughts and ideas are a result of the excellent discussion that I had with my friend Prashant on my last trip to the US. I completely agree with these and feel happy for being the devil’s advocate that I was.
10 comments:
Anant,
It was a great read...
The Sanskrit sloka says "Vidya dadati vinayam..." but unfortunately our education do not render us with the highly sought for "Vinayam"...
What is the system of education in India?
We are not more than just information storing "living" device...
Knowledge should bring in wisdom, humility...
At least my knowledge does not. On the contrary I have gained wisdom by unlearning... I have developed humility by forgetting information which I once felt very proud of knowing...
Well said baba... hope we will take care and help the next gen be better than we were
That's quite optimistic but I do not know how.
One of my biggest issue when I was trying to explain you this stuff to you Anant was that you did not understand how radical my suggestion and idea was. I can see that you had time to think about these things that's and now you realize it a lot more, but my main issue is that although India is moving towards more liberty at a slow pace, if people don't understand the concept of liberty(especially economic liberty) then they will stop moving there pretty soon. That's exactly what's happening in America. America has stopped moving towards more liberty, in fact after years of building its economic wealth through free market and capitalism it has been sliding towards tyranny and centralized government.
I see Satyakam complain about the 'quality' of education, but I just find that laughable(I am not laughing at you Satyakam, but the fact the way people have been made to believe that the better quality of education the more prosperous they can get). It is funny for me because its like imagine middle ages, Einstein is a clerk somewhere for some king, and he discovers theory of relativity. Does that mean he will not die by some disease or not be killed in a war or by hunger? What exactly is missing in this picture? Why wouldn't good quality education eliminate hunger and poverty from 16th century India? Sure you may say that people would be able to achieve a lot more if they were educated, but this is not true.
The problem with the 'Einstein in middle ages' scenario is that there is not lack of knowledge, but lack of capital(and by capital I don't mean money or 'assets'). Its like saying only if I knew how an airplane flies, I can fly in the air. Sadly that's not how human reality works. Not only you need the knowledge on how to build the airplane, you also need the material(Titanium or whatever airplanes are made of) to build that airplane. In simple words you need knowledge + means.
Problem with this education-mania is its just wishful thinking, only if everybody in India was educated in Ivy League colleges of America we would be as rich as Americans. Why do people think that? People think that because in our parent's generation, being educated was the ONLY possible way to lift yourself out of poverty, because when you were educated the government gave you a job. If not then you have to be the relative of an educated guy who had a job at the government and then you can get a blue collar menial job like phone line operator or sweeping streets.
Obsession of education in India is so disasterous that people are ok with the idea that we can trade all the bricks we have to build a house for the knowledge to build a super awesome Empire State style skyscrapper. The problem is:
a) We don't have enough bricks to build an empire state style skyscrapper
b) Even if we did have enough bricks, you are giving them all away for getting the knowledge to build a house for which you don't have enough bricks
Why do we obsesses so much about having the knowledge to build a palace when we are squandering our resources away to build a decent medium size building. Because we are giving away our bricks for the knowledge of building a palace, we end up with a small kaccha hut instead of a decent medium size building we could have had, and we already knew how to build a decent medium size building.
So what I am trying to say here is, in order to get prosperous you don't even need new knowledge(remember earlier 'knowledge+means', well take knowledge out of it), as long as you have the means to do something, you can use your existing knowledge to build existing stuff and take your own time to acquire new knowledge. What this means is if we can only build a medium size house, lets build that and live in it until we acquire more bricks to build a larger house and by that time we will acquire more knowledge on how to build a bigger better house.
Continued..
....continued
Problem with this education-mania is its just wishful thinking, only if everybody in India was educated in Ivy League colleges of America we would be as rich as Americans. Why do people think that? People think that because in our parent's generation, being educated was the ONLY possible way to lift yourself out of poverty, because when you were educated the government gave you a job. If not then you have to be the relative of an educated guy who had a job at the government and then you can get a blue collar menial job like phone line operator or sweeping streets.
Obsession of education in India is so disasterous that people are ok with the idea that we can trade all the bricks we have to build a house for the knowledge to build a super awesome Empire State style skyscrapper. The problem is:
a) We don't have enough bricks to build an empire state style skyscrapper
b) Even if we did have enough bricks, you are giving them all away for getting the knowledge to build a house for which you don't have enough bricks
Why do we obsesses so much about having the knowledge to build a palace when we are squandering our resources away to build a decent medium size building. Because we are giving away our bricks for the knowledge of building a palace, we end up with a small kaccha hut instead of a decent medium size building we could have had, and we already knew how to build a decent medium size building.
So what I am trying to say here is, in order to get prosperous you don't even need new knowledge(remember earlier 'knowledge+means', well take knowledge out of it), as long as you have the means to do something, you can use your existing knowledge to build existing stuff and take your own time to acquire new knowledge. What this means is if we can only build a medium size house, lets build that and live in it until we acquire more bricks to build a larger house and by that time we will acquire more knowledge on how to build a bigger better house.
....continued
This is exactly India's problem. People believe that only if we know how to build iPhones and iPods, people in India would be using and producing them all over. What is missing in India? Why can't we build iPhones and iPods just like America does?
Ok lets look at this thing, China produces iPhones and iPods, but all for America not for itself. This must be a real bummer for the 'educationist' people. How is this possible that a country knows how to produce latest gadgets, is producing them by its own people on its own land, YET nobody is producing it for the people of that country. The answer here is simple, its the American savings and capital which is being used to facilitate the production of iPhone and iPads, not Chinese savings and capital. Its like wondering if a builder can produce building for a client, he knows how to produce it, he has directed his crew many many times to build houses, but somehow he himself does not live in a large house like he builds. His workers live in even more pathetic houses. So how is that possible?
The answer here is again quite simple, having knowledge itself isn't sufficient, in fact its far from sufficient. What is missing is that builder's own savings and wealth which allows him to acquire bricks and cement for him to build a house for himself.
We see India going prosperous, but is it really getting prosperous? What we did was squander our capital over education. Sure Americans are also squandering their wealth on education(google 'No Child Left Behind'), but they have a lot more capital than India to waste. We educate our kids by wasting our wealth only to have them work for Americans.
My point here is Anant that we are overspending on education. We are educating FAR too many kids and for far more skills than we really require. On the top of that we are STILL massively brainwashed that we are just not getting enough education. If Satyakam really does not believe that in India we are getting the required education then he has no idea what kind of education American kids are getting.
One of the most common retort I got was "if you don't think poor people's kids should get educated then who are you to decide whether or not they should get education or not". My reply was quite simple, I am not saying that poor people's kids should not get education, all I am saying is that by ensuring EVERYBODY gets education we are ensuring that very less number of people get jobs. But the people still didn't understand it, they told me that I had no idea how much wealth India had. Well unless spending $800 on food, and $900 on house over a $1000 salary resulted in you still having some money left, there is no way India has more capital than what its squandering over education.
BTW the full story of that man on an island is.
Two people, Robinson Crusoe, and Man Friday end up on an island. They both catch fish by hand. Robinson Crusoe catches 25 fishes everyday, and Man Friday catches 10 fishes everyday and they both eat them all(they are still left a bit hungry after that).
Robinson Crusoe being a more natural fisherman when he was on mainland, so he realizes that if he builds a fishing net he will be able to catch a lot more fishes. He estimates a net like that will take around 5 days to be built, and it will give him 300 fishes everyday and it will work for about a year. So you must say that Crusoe would definitely wanna build this net. But his problem is that he cannot just wish the fishing net, or just start working on it and 5 days later he will have a net ready. While he is building this net he cannot go for catching fishes, that means he will not be able to feed himself.
His solution: To save some fishes everyday until he gets enough fish that he can sustain himself over the period of fishing net building. So he decides to reduce his present consumption from 25 fishes to 20 fishes. He catches 25 fishes everyday but he stores 5 of them(don't worry how fishes will remain fresh). This is what I call capital accumulation. A little math tells you that after twenty days he will have accumulated enough fishes that will allow him to work 5 days without catching fishes.
Capitalist Scenario: In capitalism he builds that fishing net and that enables him to catch upto 300 fishes everyday, which he either consumes it all or works only 10-20% of the time and spends the remaining time in leisure. This is exactly how America and other western nations got rich.
...continue
One of the most common retort I got was "if you don't think poor people's kids should get educated then who are you to decide whether or not they should get education or not". My reply was quite simple, I am not saying that poor people's kids should not get education, all I am saying is that by ensuring EVERYBODY gets education we are ensuring that very less number of people get jobs. But the people still didn't understand it, they told me that I had no idea how much wealth India had. Well unless spending $800 on food, and $900 on house over a $1000 salary resulted in you still having some money left, there is no way India has more capital than what its squandering over education.
BTW the full story of that man on an island is.
Two people, Robinson Crusoe, and Man Friday end up on an island. They both catch fish by hand. Robinson Crusoe catches 25 fishes everyday, and Man Friday catches 10 fishes everyday and they both eat them all(they are still left a bit hungry after that).
Robinson Crusoe being a more natural fisherman when he was on mainland, so he realizes that if he builds a fishing net he will be able to catch a lot more fishes. He estimates a net like that will take around 5 days to be built, and it will give him 300 fishes everyday and it will work for about a year. So you must say that Crusoe would definitely wanna build this net. But his problem is that he cannot just wish the fishing net, or just start working on it and 5 days later he will have a net ready. While he is building this net he cannot go for catching fishes, that means he will not be able to feed himself.
His solution: To save some fishes everyday until he gets enough fish that he can sustain himself over the period of fishing net building. So he decides to reduce his present consumption from 25 fishes to 20 fishes. He catches 25 fishes everyday but he stores 5 of them(don't worry how fishes will remain fresh). This is what I call capital accumulation. A little math tells you that after twenty days he will have accumulated enough fishes that will allow him to work 5 days without catching fishes.
....continued
Capitalist Scenario: In capitalism he builds that fishing net and that enables him to catch upto 300 fishes everyday, which he either consumes it all or works only 10-20% of the time and spends the remaining time in leisure. This is exactly how America and other western nations got rich.
Socialist Scenario: Man Friday approaches the Crusoe who is eating 5 fishes less everyday to build up his capital. He accuses him of hoarding. He claims that when he is only able to consume 10 fishes each day, Crusoe is not only consuming 20 fishes each day he is hoarding on 5 fishes too. Man Friday forces/convinces Crusoe to give him his saved 5 fishes each day. Although temporarily Man Friday is able to feed himself soon he gets frustrated by the saving, so he decide to not save any more fishes and he consumes all 25 fishes. So Man Friday is back to eating 10 fishes each day and Crusoe continues feeding himself 25 fishes each day.
Indian Scenario: Man Friday approaches Crusoe and claims that once Crusoe builds his net he will become rich. Its highly unfair that Crusoe gets to become rich by using his knowledge. Man Friday demands that Crusoe gives him 3 fishes each day out of his saved 5 fishes, so that Man Friday can spend some of his time each day to train himself in building fishing nets.
Although Man Friday is learning how to build fishing nets, Crusoe requires a LOT more number of days to save enough wealth to build that fishing net. Instead of waiting 20 days reducing his present consumption, he now has to wait 50 days to build that fishing net.
Man Friday who now knows how to build a fishing net realizes that he will not be able to feed himself for the 5 days he is required to build that fishing net, so he is never able to build himself a fishing net, or possibly when Crusoe gets his net he forces him to feed Friday for the 5 days he is going to build his net.
....continued
Despite of of being in a state of a much more relative poverty, Man Friday still looks at the Capitalist society I described earlier and claims that he is poor because he does not know how to build a fishing net, its the lack of good education.
On the other hand if we revisit the Capitalist society, we realize that poor Man Friday wasn't a good fisherman to start with. In fact Man Friday was a good entertainer(well lets say Man Friday is Shahrukh Khan, he cannot catch good fish, but he sure can entertain). In this society where Crusoe is now capable of producing 300 fishes each day, Man Friday realizes that he can now simply stop catching fishes and start doing something else, like he spends all day thinking of a good play or a skit, and when Crusoe comes back him, he entertains Crusoe for 4 hours, in exchange of 50 fishes.
So you see in a capitalist society the poor will be much better off because now they are capable of doing some other utility jobs for the most productive individuals of the society.
Watch this short youtube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWsx1X8PV_A
Post a Comment